|

|
|

|
|
Optical D.O. technology is revolutionizing water quality monitoring by eliminating the need for frequent membrane changes, stirring, and frequent calibration during deployments. The In-Situ® optical Dissolved Oxygen sensor, called Rugged D.O. (RDO®), utilizes advances in lifetime-based optical fluorescence technology to provide an extremely stable, precise and low maintenance dissolved oxygen sensor. Unlike other optical D.O. sensors on the market, the RDO’s innovative design eliminates hydration and photobleaching effects. In addition, the RDO’s 5-year lumiphore life delivers a lower cost of ownership by minimizing maintenance and calibration requirements.
Features:
|

|
No hydration effects
|
|
|

|
Store wet or dry
|
|

|
No conditioning necessary prior to use
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
No photobleaching effects
|
|
|
|

|
Not effected by ambient light
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
5 year lumiphore life
|
|
|
|

|
No membrane to change
|
|

|
No fill solution
|
|

|
Minimal maintenance - replace sensor foil every 5 years or 5 million readings
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
High precision and accuracy
|
|
|

|
Low drift
|
|

|
Excellent performance in anoxic conditions (0 ppm)
|
|

|
Fast and stable response
|
|

|
|
|
 |
Low maintenance |
|
|

|
No flow requirements - no stirring
|
 |
Up to 1 year between calibrations dependent on water matrix |
|

|
|
|
 |
Rugged |
|
|

|
Not "poisoned" by sulfides
|
|
 
|
No cross sensitivity to: H2S, pH, CO2, NH3, SO4-, Cl-, MeOH, EtOH, various ionic species
|
|

|
Performs in most water monitoring applications
|
|

|
Not subject to "thermal shocking"
|
|

|
|
|
|
 |

Two options are available:
|
30-DAY NO RISK GUARANTEE - If you don't like it after 30-days just return for full credit.
|
|
Optical Technology addresses age-old problems with electrochemical D.O. sensors.
Stirring, membrane replacement, maintenance, maintenance, maintenance.
Dissolved Oxygen (D.O.) is the single most important parameter monitored when examining aquatic biology and related processes. Until recently the ability to accurately monitor dissolved oxygen levels over long periods of time was limited. Electrochemical sensors (Clark, Galvanic) require sample stirring and are functionally limited by the durability of their membrane and electrode, while galvanic diffusion types offer characteristically slow response. Optical dissolved oxygen technology eliminates the need for stirrin, frequent membrane replacements and calibration.
The optical technology incorporated in the RDO® sensor centers around the field-proven methodology of Lifetime-based Luminescent Dissolved Oxygen detection. This solid-state method uses LEDs to excite a fluorescent material, while an optical receptor gauges the duration, or lifetime, of the event. The duration of fluorescence is inversely proportional to the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water.
Environmental Industry interest in the RDO® sensor is centered around the fact, that in many instances, the RDO® can remain deployed through entire testing seasons, spanning months, without calibration; at the same time retaining its accuracy in even the harshest of fouling environments, without the need for stirring.
All dissolved oxygen sensors are subject to interference from active bio-fouling. Optical sensors may be affected in that the actual D.O. levels in the water near the sensing element can become locally elevated or depressed. Unlike electrochemical sensors which will need a replacement of the membrane and filling solution, followed by a calibration, the optical sensor can simply be cleaned and redeployed; the calibration is unaffected.
|
When making critical decisions based on D.O., which data would you rather see?
|
|

|
The data on the left is from a traditional Clark-electrode, while the one on the right is from an In-Situ® RDO® sensor. Surprisingly, this data is from the same water sample. So why the difference? Optical D.O. is inherently more stable, has little to no drift, and higher precision than a Clark style D.O. electrode.
|
Compare the old and the new:
|
Electrochemical
(Clark, Galvanic) Sensors
|

|
In-Situ® Optical D.O. Sensor
|
|
Readings ARE affected by
|
|
Readings ARE NOT affected by
|
|
Flow/Stirring
Age of the membrane and electrolyte
Proper maintenance and calibration
Storage and sensor conditioning
Thermal Shock
|
|
Flow/Stirring
Age of the membrane and electrolyte
Proper maintenance and calibration
Storage and sensor conditioning
Thermal Shock
|
|
=
|
|
=
|
|
POOR QUALITY DATA
Without frequent calibration and maintenance the electrochemical sensors are difficult to use for accurate and dependable measurement.
HIGH COST OF OWNERSHIP
Many deployments require a site visit every two weeks or more often to calibrate and replace failed sensors.
|
|
HIGH QUALITY DATA
Accurate and reliable dissolved oxygen measurement every time.
LOWER COST OF OWNERSHIP
Less visits to the site, less cleaning, less maintenance and calibration, and more quality data.
EASE OF USE
Finally D.O. measurements without the hassle.
|
|
|
Why Optical D.O.? The new RDO® sensor is to the Clark cell what the computer was to the typewriter. Now you can:
- Eliminate the need for complex sensor storage and conditioning
- Reliably measure oxygen concentration with accuracy and precision
- Eliminate the need for flow/stirring
- Eliminate the need for changing membranes and fill solution
- Eliminate unwanted temperature effects
ANSWER: Higher quality data at a lower cost of ownership
|
 |
|
Old Clark-style D.O. sensor
|
New Optical D.O. sensor
|
|
7 RDO® sensors match precisely with Winkler Titrations and other lab methods
RDO® does not require stirring

Graph shows test of Clark electrode vs. an RDO® sensor with and without stirring. Notice how the Clark-electrode is adversely affected when stirring is turned off while the RDO® continues to display an accurate reading.
3rd-Party testing -- RDO® shows superior accuracy and stability
The In-Situ® RDO® was selected to participate in a study funded by the Alliance for Coastal Technologies (ACT) to research advances in D.O. measurement technology. The Alliance for Coastal Technologies (ACT) ,is a NOAA funded partnership of research institutions, state and regional resource managers, and private sector companies. ACT is interested in developing and applying sensor technologies for monitoring and studying coastal environments.One of the goals of the ACT organization is to work as a test-bed for evaluating new and developing coastal sensor and sensor platform technologies. The first tests performed by ACT focused on evaluating different oxygen sensing technologies. Tests were done at seven different field sites (one month at each) and in the laboratory.
ACT Evaluation -- Summary of Results
(The following table was generated by In-Situ® based on ACT data)
|
Method
|
Winkler Titration Method
|
Optical Fluorescence Method
|
Polarographic Electrochemical Method
|
Galvanic Electrochemical Method
|
|
|
Average Initial Error
|
(reference method)
|
0.2 mg/L
|
0.5 mg/L
|
0.2 mg/L
|
How accurate was it at the beginning?
|
|
Frequency of Initial Errors < 0.2 mg/L
|
(reference method)
|
50%
|
40%
|
10%
|
|
Frequency of Initial Errors > 2.0 mg/L
|
(reference method)
|
0%
|
10%
|
60%
|
|
Individual Precision
|
0.22%
|
0.11%
|
0.11%
|
0.15%
|
|
|
Typical Drift during first week, mg/L
|
(reference method)
|
0.4 mg/L
|
0.7 mg/L
|
1.0 mg/L
|
How bad was the drift?
|
|
Variability of Drift
|
(reference method)
|
0.6 mg/L
|
3.9 mg/L
|
0.7 mg/L
|
Full report can be downloaded at:
http://www.act-us.info/evaluation_reports.php
|
Optical D.O. Technology - how does it work?
|

|
|
|

|
The sensing element (lumiphore) is activated, or excited when illuminated with a blue light
|
|

|
When activated, the lumiphore emits red light in an intensity that is inversely proportional to the amount of oxygen present in the water
|
|

|
There is also a time delay between the peak emission of blue light and peak response of fluoresced red light. The amount of delay is inversely proportional to the amount of oxygen present.
|
|

|
This time delay can be expressed as a phase shift between the wave patterns of incident blue light and the fluoresced red light
|
 |
In-Situ® optical D.O. sensor is not affected by sample color or turbidity |
|

|
|
|
All of the optics and electronics are solid-state with no moving parts
|
 |
|
 |
All optical D.O. sensors do not use the same technology.
3 ways to measure using optics:

1. Magnitude -- Measures peak height of luminescence. Accuracy is impacted over time as the lumiphore degrades due to photobleaching by ambient light
2. Time Domain --Measures the decay rate of the luminescence but the signal to noise ratio can limit the sensor range.
3. Phase Domain -- Phase domain measures the phase difference based on the entire signal and references wave forms across a population of pulses. This method delivers the highest accuracy and widest operating range. This is the method used by the In-Situ® RDO®.
|
|
Item
|
Specification
|
|
Accuracy and precision
|
+/- 0.1 mg/L from 0-10 mg/L; +/- 1% of reading from 10-20 mg/L
|
|
Operating range
|
0-20 mg/L or 0-450% saturation
|
|
Temperature range (operating)
Temperature range (storage)
|
0 to 40 °C
-40 to 80 °C
|
|
Salinity range
|
Up to 42 ppt
|
|
pH range
|
0-12 pH
|
|
Typical response limit
|
>25 mg/L
|
|
Response Time
|
T90 = 12 seconds
|
|
Technology
|
Lumiphore impregnated foil matrix, dynamic luminescence quenching technique using phase domain detection. The In-Situ® optical D.O. technology does not require hydration before use or during storage.
|
|
Calibration
|
1 or 2 point
|
|
Typical calibration duration
|
12 months (clean water)
|
|
Known interferences
|
Interferences (cross-sensitivity) are found for gaseous sulfur dioxide (SO2) and gaseous chlorine (Cl2).
The sensors can be used in methanol- and ethanol -water mixtures as well as in pure methanol and ethanol. The In-Situ® optical D.O. sensor should not be used in other organic solvents, such as acetone, chloroform or methylene chloride, which may swell the foil matrix and destroy it.
There exists no cross sensitivity for carbon dioxide (CO2), ammonia (NH3), pH, any ionic species like sulfide (S2- ), sulfate (SO42-), chloride (Cl-) or hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The In-Situ® optical D.O. sensor will not be damaged by hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and it is not cross-sensitive to it. If H2S is present the oxygen concentration should be zero or very close to zero since oxygen (O2) and H2S rarely coexists, especially over longer time periods.
|
|
Material
|
Delrin®
|
|
Sensor foil technology
|
Platinum porphyrin lumiphore embedded in polyester
|
|
Typical sensor foil life
|
5 years or 5 million measurements
|
| Sensor warranty |
3 years from date of purchase |
|
Dimensions, RDO® sensor
RDO® sensor adapter assembly
|
36mm (1.4 in) OD, 89mm (3.5 in) long
88.4mm (3.5 in) OD, 20.3cm (8.0 in) long
|
| Storage |
Wet or dry |
|